California Bans Unvaccinated Children from Attending Public Schools
Kids without mandatory vaccines removed from state schools
Following California's new immunization law, it is now illegal for children to attend public schools unless they have been vaccinated.
The new law criminalizes children who haven't received mandatory vaccines and bans them from receiving a state-funded education until they've been immunized.
Many parents and children have unnecessarily be turned into criminals after the new bill removed religious and philosophical exemptions for vaccines, making the state one of the leading proponents of medical tyranny in the U.S.
It is now against the law for unvaccinated kids to go to public schools in the Golden State, and children attend without being vaccinated, will be removed from the premises.
Dr. Richard Pan, one of the leading proponents of forced vaccination, is the same senator who sponsored last year’s mandatory vaccine campaign.
Pan is back pushing a new proposal to gain even more control over children’s lives which will make vaccines mandatory for ALL children living in California.
HIN reports: California Senator Dr. Richard Pan pushed through the mandatory vaccine law SB 277 with financial backing from vaccine manufacturers to ban children from public and private schools unless most of the CDC vaccine schedule was completed. Previous allowable vaccination exemptions are no longer allowed, except for medical exemptions.
However, one prestigious California pediatrician is being threatened with losing his license to practice for issuing a medical exemption to vaccines to one of his patients. Could this be the State’s method of shutting down doctors who dare to write vaccine exemptions, so that soon not even medical exemptions will be readily available to those who need them?
Other such state bills mandating vaccines and removing exemptions were easily defeated across the U.S. in 2015, due to public outcry.
Yet even though the public outcry was probably the loudest in California in opposition to SB 277, it somehow still passed.
California became the first state to remove religious and philosophical exemptions to vaccines. Two other states, Mississippi and West Virginia, have never had such exemptions, and their yearly health statistics on children are consistently among the worst in the United States.
Will the health of California’s children now decline due to mandated increases in vaccination rates?
Now that same state senator, Dr. Pan, is introducing new legislation, SB 18, that allows the state to assume total ownership of a child’s well being, as defined by state and medical bureaucratic “experts.”
SB 18: Bill of Rights for Children and Youth in California
This new bill references a 2009 Assembly Concurrent Resolution (ACR) 80. An ACR is a resolution created by members of the California Assembly, which is actually their state house of representatives. It was originally intended as a bill of rights for foster children.
SB 18 is a very loosely worded, open-ended draft introduced in the state senate, which permits future additional rules and regulations that are meant to “organize” and “codify” (create more laws) ACR 80 according to “experts” observations and evaluations.
And who would be the “experts” mentioned in SB 18? They would be mainstream medical professionals who consider the only treatments for cancer are surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy.
They would be the CDC and other pro-vaccine medical doctors who consider multiple heavy vaccinations as necessary for good health. These are activities that so far most adults can pass on for safer and more effective alternative means. But the government does not want you to have those choices for your own kids.
“Medical Child Abuse” – The New Diagnosis Used for Medical Tyranny and State-sponsored Child Kidnapping
The common claim of “medical child abuse” is used for not acquiescing to medical procedures, some experimental, that most knowledgeable adults shun. Parents and children in some cases have had to go on the lam as fugitives from the law when they decided to discontinue medical practices that were harming their children.
A whole new pediatric sub-specialty was created in recent years with the advent of the “Child Abuse Specialist.”
This is a pediatrician that acts more like a law enforcement officer by looking at x-rays and medical records to determine if a child has been abused by their parents or caregivers.
They seldom interview the parents or children, or even the family pediatrician who knows the family. Finding abuse is necessary to justify their profession, and courts are increasingly finding that many innocent people have been wrongly convicted.
The DEA’s “war on drugs” is also used to remove children from homes where parents used marijuana for medical reasons in many states where it is legal.
Experts can also be public education bureaucrats who look down on homeschooling as depriving a child’s optimal education, even though public schools turn out semi-literate kids who are incapable of critical thinking. They will also support efforts to diagnose children with ADHD and drug them with psychotropics.
Increased Role for CPS?
Removing children from existing parents to enforce state bureaucratic perspectives of what’s good for children, according to experts, is left to the Child Protective Services (CPS), which does so by removing children from their families and placing them into private and/or institutional foster homes.
CPS depends on federal funding for each child they remove from a home and placed into foster care, so many CPS officials are motivated to lie, distort, and falsify documents to achieve their successes of removing children from parents.